On July 13th 2024, former President Trump narrowly escaped death when a bullet grazed his head and struck his ear during a presidential rally in Butler, PA. As the nation grappled with the aftermath of this assassination attempt, the political landscape was thrown into even greater turmoil. In an effort to understand the broader implications of this event, we turned to the voices of everyday citizens. Using Engage, our AI Conversation Interview platform, we conducted in-depth interviews with 80 participants across the political spectrum. We explored their perspectives on political polarization, national unity, the potential for compromise, and how their views may have shifted in light of the recent events. While pervasive discourse emphasizes division in the United States, our goal was to uncover whether this polarization truly mirrors public sentiment or if there is, perhaps, a deeper desire for unity. Below, we share some of the insights from these interviews.
Navigating Political Polarization:
A Mother’s Perspective on Future Generations and National Unity
41 White Woman, Democrat, Somewhat Liberal
To start, can you share your thoughts on the current level of political polarization in the United States and how it affects you personally?
I think it's incredibly unhealthy to have the level of polarization that we do. It impacts me personally because I have children and worry about their future in a country that can't even agree on what the facts of the situation are. Moreover, my safety is impacted, as the recent Supreme Court decision showed that's going to allow for substantially more pollution in the U.S.--that wouldn't have happened if the court hadn't been packed by ideologues.
Continue Reading
Thank you for sharing. Could you elaborate on a particular instance where this political polarization has affected you or your family's day-to-day life or your conversations with friends or family about current political events?
Yes, I feel like I can't even have a friendly conversation about politics with people I'm close to because we're all so demoralized and scared about the future.
I see, that must be tough. Can you tell me more about how these conversations usually go? Do they start out civil and then escalate, or is there immediate tension once politics is brought up?
There's just tension right away and you can see people kind of deflate. Everyone I talk with is mostly on the same page as me, but we don't even want to discuss it because we feel powerless and exhausted.
In your view, what does 'national unification' mean, and why is it important or not important to you?
I don't think everyone will always agree on everything, but the idea of national unification, to some degree, is still important because as Americans, we're all supposed to share at least some of the same values. So I think national unification would mean not everyone always being in agreement, but all of us at least respecting one another and not wishing harm on one another, and able to agree broadly on things like what is true and what we should value.
I appreciate your perspective. You touched upon respectful disagreement and shared values being part of national unification. Can you provide an example or incident from your life or community which made you realize the importance of these virtues for national unification?
It's all around us now; the idea of labeling anything you don't like as "fake news" is incredibly harmful because people on different sides of the aisle can't even agree on facts, despite the evidence being clear cut.
Thank you for your response. It's clear that you're concerned about the spread and acceptance of misinformation. Can you elaborate on why you think this is a barrier to national unification? Also, how do you think we as a country can overcome this challenge?
Misinformation is a huge barrier to unification because if everyone is just in their own bubbles, their perspectives are never challenged. It's easy to see everyone else as the "other" not to be trusted, and to surround yourself with cherry-picked facts and truths that reinforce your beliefs rather than engage in honest dialogue. I think fact checkers will play a role in combating this, but we have to get people to have trust in institutions again, like the government and media, so they don't automatically distrust a number from a government agency, reported by a major news network.
Thank you for shedding light on that. Trust in essential institutions does seem to be a crucial factor in uniting people. Reflecting on the United States' historical context or possibly other countries you've observed, can you identify any actions or qualities in leaders that you believe helped or hindered the process of national unification?
Leaders that are only out for themselves, that are selfish and just pander to their base, play tit-for-tat politics and engage in cronyism are obviously bad for unification--that was obvious enough under Trump, and other scandal-plagued administrations like that of Harding. Politicians that are willing to work across the aisle, compromise, and be flexible are more successful; Doris Kearns Goodwin wrote a whole book about Lincoln called "Team of Rivals" that highlighted how he sought out different opinions from his own and was willing to listen to others.
Thank you for sharing. That perspective on leadership sounds very insightful. Looking at the broader picture, how do you think the sense of unity in the country has changed over the years? And what impact do you believe this has had on the concept, and possible realization, of National Unification?
The unity of the country has obviously gone down; there were undeniable undercurrents in racism in the conservative backlash to the eight years of the Obama administration and then Trump went out of his way to spite others and only look out for himself rather than trying to govern everyone fairly.
Would you be willing to compromise on some of your policy beliefs and preferences to support a movement toward greater unity?
Yes, depending on the belief/policy.
I understand the notion of being selective about the policies where you'd be willing to compromise. Could you provide examples of specific policies or areas where you might be open to compromise, and why? Conversely, are there any specific policies or areas where you would be reluctant to compromise, and why?
I wouldn't want to compromise on things like reproductive rights or climate change, or gun control, because these are existential threats to my safety and that of others. But in terms of fiscal policy there could be room for compromise.
That's insightful. As you've mentioned fiscal policy as a potential area for compromise, can you elaborate on what kind of compromises you might be willing to entertain within this space? Can you also explain why you feel more able to be flexible within fiscal policy as opposed to the other key issues you mentioned?
Fiscal policy is rarely all black and white. So some tax cuts in some areas could be offset with subsidies in another, for example. More lenient policies can be paired with incentives for companies to make positive changes, etc.
Have your views on national unity and/or political opponents changed after the attempted assassination incident?
No; the fact that Trump was nearly assassinated doesn't change the fact that he was a horrible president and a divisive figure in America.
That's understandable. Can you share more about other potential steps or methods that should be taken to promote national unity in the face of such extreme events? Are there any approaches you believe should be absolutely avoided in these efforts to promote national unification?
Everyone on all sides should condemn political violence for one, and also acknowledge the power of incendiary rhetoric and agree to not engage in it.
The Impact of Misinformation and the Role of Leadership in National Unification
39 Black Man or African American, Democrat, Very liberal
To start, can you share your thoughts on the current level of political polarization in the United States and how it affects you personally?
I think the country is very polarized with people on both sides being very angry at each other and forming into opposite groups that dislike each other. There is a competitive tone among democrats and republicans when they speak on why they are voting for the candidates they are supporting.
Continue Reading
Could you please share a specific example or incident where you observed this aggressive competition between Democrats and Republicans? How did this event influence your perceptions of political polarization?
When former president Donald Trump was recently shot, many democratic identifying voters claimed it was a staged event. Republican identifying voters claimed that the CIA orchestrated the shooting, and that the Secret Service did not provide Donald Trump with adequate security.
I can see how that event might be disturbing. How did this claim and counterclaim from Democrats and Republicans influence your personal relationships or discussions with friends, family, or colleagues?
The people that I know that are Donald Trump supporters have doubled down in their support for Trump, while the people who do not back him have taken a stance that Trump staged the shooting to increase his support among voters.
In your view, what does 'national unification' mean, and why is it important or not important to you?
I think national unification means that the citizens of the country come together to make decisions that better the country for everyone as a whole, regardless of their political beliefs. I feel that national unification is very important to improve the relations in the country, which will allow the brain trust of the country to focus on using technology to improve the lives of all of its citizens.
I appreciate your definition of 'national unification'. Based on your observation and personal experiences, could you describe any examples that demonstrate why national unification is essential in your community?
When the country decided to hold mass protest in response to George Floyd's murder, the unity and united stance of the protestors and society in general caused sweeping changes to be made in policing across the country.
That's definitely a significant example. On the subject of these collective actions, can you share any specific emotions or concerns you have experienced or observed in regards to the state of unity in the country? Particularly in such times of public challenge or protest?
I felt really proud to see people protest from every culture, racial and economic background, and multiple age ranges come together for a common cause across the country collectively.
That's a powerful perspective to have. Now, in relation to the leadership, could you discuss whether specific actions or qualities in political leaders, regardless of parties, have helped or hindered the cause of national unification according to your experience or observation?
I think some of former President Trump's speeches have hindered national unification because it has caused people to pick a side, and view those with opposing views as enemies. I think people got along better overall under the leadership of former President Barrack Obama.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on leadership and its role in national unification. Let's talk about changes over time. How has your sense of unity in our country changed over the years? Can you also share any specific incidents or experiences that have shaped this shift in your perceptions?
I feel more connected to people on a whole since the pandemic, and I try not to let differences in political beliefs affect my relationships with the people in my life.
Would you be willing to compromise on some of your policy beliefs and preferences to support a movement toward greater unity?
I would be willing absolutely. Unity will allow the country to flourish and make life easier and happier for all citizens.
That's a very encouraging perspective. Could you perhaps share which policy areas you think it would be essential or possible to achieve such compromises for the benefit of unity? And in what ways do you believe different stakeholders, like politicians, citizens or organizations, could facilitate these policy compromises?
I think a universal basic income, healthcare for all, and improvements to public transportation across the country will benefit all citizens.
Thank you for pointing out those policy areas. If you could, please give me some details on how you visualize an ideal scenario where policy compromises in these areas could take place, particularly amongst different stakeholders like politicians, citizens or organizations. How would these compromises lead to better national unity, according to you?
I think we have enough of a tax base to support all of the policies that I mentioned. We can divert some military spending and foreign aid to those policies to improve the lives of our citizens.
Have your views on national unity and/or political opponents changed after the attempted assassination incident?
No, I actually think we should have a bigger focus put on Unity since that event took place.
Can you tell me more about why you think that event should lead to more focus on unity? Were there specific reactions or consequences you saw following the incident that made you feel this way?
If the country wasn't so polarized on a political level, and made to look at the opposite political party as an enemy, we would not have people attempting to assassinate political candidates.
Finding Common Ground:
Bipartisan Solutions and the Importance of Character in Politics
57 White Man, Independent, Somewhat Liberal
To start, can you share your thoughts on the current level of political polarization in the United States and how it affects you personally?
The bipolar inflexibility, of us vs them, that currently exists at the leadership level of the United States is making me question my love for the democratic process. I have always felt okay with whoever wins the most votes winning, but I've learned just how false that narrative is. It isn't about each person's votes that ends up creating a four year term in the White House. It is about who can garner the most votes in the Electoral College, an out-of-date system that needs to be overhauled since it does not reflect these United States. I'm also tired of hearing that the state I live in is a red state because there were more Republican votes last year. A third of my state didn't even vote because the find the action as a waste of their time, and they don't like to get played. The rest of the votes were almost evenly split between R and D. I would like this rhetoric to stop, this antagonism and fighting for each side. I want people to select a candidate based on the quality of the character and not the promises they make during a campaign. I just don't think that my opinion matters. Too many people are content with things being the way they are, and changing the system is a massive undertaking, one that requires too many states to agree too. They won't. I know that Obama always talked about starting at the smallest level of government, local, and working upwards. Building a coalition of those who want to see change, not change that tries to burn down the house but change that brings people along. Take any hot-button issue and the majority of people in the U.S. agree on the middle pathway. Few people are on the fringes, the extremes, yet it seems as if we're stuck in a rut, doing the same thing over and over. I tolerated Trump's name calling, thinking he was just a jerk. I hated seeing his opponents pick up the badness and do it back to him. That's just so sad. We are better than that. One thing I've always tried to do is give newbies in Congress a chance. That is why I vote for women and people of color over white men. I want fresh eyes in public spaces, to bring their ideas and energy to the table of old white men. I want to say that I have hope, but I kinda don't. I'm not sure if enough people will understand that it isn't just about voting for a candidate with character kindness. It is about ending this hate and vitriol of those who want something else. I'm working on it and would love for others to do the same.
Continue Reading
Thank you for sharing your detailed perspective. It seems like you've been deeply affected by political polarization. Can you tell me more about how this polarization has directly impacted your day-to-day life or conversations with those around you? Are there any significant instances that underscore the extent of this impact?
I have friends who are moderates and progressives, and it is easier for me to talk with them about issues that our elected leaders are supposed to handle. I have far right family members who are caught up in the cult of Trump, and I find them unwilling to think critically about what they say in my presence. I don't want to call them idiots or uninformed, but that is how I feel. I've watched plenty of videos on how important it is to listen to someone you disagree with, giving them space and tolerating the feeling inside of disgust or disappointment, but I just don't want to do that. I'd rather avoid all conversation about the important things in life just to keep my peace of mind. I live with a sister who is very upset at the hateful words that Trump and his followers say and the awful things they speak in public. I don't have comforting words because these are fellow Americans who are this way. They are people, just like us who went to school, had parents, played sports, and fell in love. Normal people living normal lives, but so darn intolerant and hateful. I want to call out people who want to cancel everyone else out, but I don't think that is wise or practical. It can only bring bad things my way. I worry that someone will get angry and break out a gun, like that kid did in Pennsylvania, trying to silence the ex-president. I do not want this to be our story. Nations all around the world are watching us to see how we handle our disagreements, and we're making a mess of it. All of the election denying, the storming the Capitol on January 6th, the numerous attempts at holding people accountable for their actions, and the breaking down of the three-levels of government, the separate but equal members, is making me fear for the unity of this nation. It makes me fear that calm words won't calm people down. It makes me fear another horrible reaction in the next big election. I remember the years when the person I voted for called the winner and congratulated them. I don't want an America where the loser cries foul and refuses to concede, then encourages their followers to "Fight! Fight! Fight!" That is happening right now. It came out of the mouth of the Republican leader seconds after he was shot at. I really want a new leader, a younger proven leader, to step up and lead by example, to be a moderate, to bring together the millions of us Independents who just want everyone to be heard and decisions to take into account the wishes of a variety of Americans, not just the people in the party who are the loudest. All Americans!
In your view, what does 'national unification' mean, and why is it important or not important to you?
For me, National Unification would involve choosing what we agree on and letting go of what we don't. Compromise. Letting people who disagree hammer out the legislation so that 100% of the vote is for new bills, not 51 for and 49 against. Bipartisan laws. I want that to become the norm. I want both parties to stop trying to ram down their ideas just because they have one or two more people than the opposition. I want agreement, not disagreement. I know that this is a hard thing to achieve. For example, Republicans are pushing for complete bans on abortion while Democrats are demanding unrestricted use of this practice. Why can't we find a common ground, one that respects a mother's rights over her own body yet understands that we could also respect the future rights of what might grow into a child, a person. We can do both in this area and in every other hot-button area. Find common ground and standing side by side, just like black and white leaders did during the Civil Rights Movement.
You mentioned that you'd like to see bipartisan laws become the norm and people finding common ground. Can you think of any recent examples where you saw this happen, or actions taken towards this? How did it make you feel?
Yes, I remember when Trump was President that Democrats and Republicans in either the House or Senate got together and hammered out a bipartisan bill that respected the rights of incarcerated people who were not in there for violent crimes on other people, but often drug crimes, possession, activities that really only affected themselves, and together they made a law that both parties could agree with. I don't remember all the details, but I remember how proud I was that they got something done. Neither side got all of their wishes met, but they did help many people who were locked up, and that is a good thing. This made me proud to be an American, proud to be an Independent who votes for both Republicans and Democrats for every election.
That's an encouraging example. In your opinion, what are the barriers or challenges that might be preventing this level of bipartisanship from becoming a regular occurrence? Specifically, what things need to change to make this the norm rather than the exception?
The short-term of House members, just two years, does not help create long-term bipartisan work. Instead, it promotes me-ism, with each person focusing only on their own needs, their desire to get people to invest in their campaigns, and too much pay-for-play stuff behind closed doors. Another real challenge is instant access to news via social media outlets and news sources online. Everyone has instant access to the latest "Breaking News" headline, and we're just going bonkers with all the bad news and bad actions and bad characters in our face 24/7. The internet hasn't made us kinder and more tolerant people, but citizens living in our silos, paying attention to only what the algorithms feed us, which is more of the poison we've grown accustomed to drinking. We are pushing ourselves away from each other, and it is just plain old stupid. We're being stupid. What we need is distance, separation from the firehose of bad news being spewed at us constantly. We need to turn off for a while and just work and relax. But we've become addicted to the madness. Another barrier is that we have a system where anyone can run for office, despite their character or lack of training. It's silly, but we wouldn't let a football player become a doctor without years of formal training. We expect teachers to go through years of training, yet anyone can run for President and get elected, if they just present themselves in a way that people like.
Would you be willing to compromise on some of your policy beliefs and preferences to support a movement toward greater unity?
I have and do. I used to believe that abortion should be legal for women at all stages of their pregnancy, but I've listened to people talk about how disrespectful that is to the potential life growing inside of the womb, so I've pushed back my agreement to a middle ground, to around 16 weeks. It isn't a total ban and it isn't complete freedom. It is in between and I want others to join me here, in the middle. I also feel the same way about immigration. There has to be agreement if we want to get things done. I'm for applying money to real-world solutions, ideas that respect the history of our nation as a nation of immigrants, yet provides rules about entry and how long a person can stay and what they can do while here. If we infuse kindness into each decision, and stop pretending like only our view matters, then compromises will be met. I willingly stand by the side of any candidate who promotes the idea of Unity. I'm ready!
You mentioned your willingness for compromise in order to foster unity and progress. In your opinion, what are some strategies or mechanisms that politicians and citizens might use to facilitate more policy compromises? Can you think of any recent or historical examples where such strategies have been successful?
Let's see. We went to the moon by tasking smart people with goals, then supplying them with the tools they needed. There were failures, but at each juncture, the workers kept their eye on the target, on getting to the moon, and they did it in one decade. That is what it will take today. It will take a generation of leaders who establish clear outcomes and then support all the workers who make it happen. For immigration, it is lawyers, judges, agents, therapists, job finders, housing reps. For the economy, it is workers, business owners, city managers, contractors, council members. For education, it is teachers, parents, publishers, writers, directors. If we really wanted every US citizen to be ready for the next two decades, then we would train all teachers in how to use AI in their jobs, and they'd train all students in how to use AI as a tool for writing, research, artistic creations, persuasive arguments. We'd invest in the training and explain that the goal is to maximize human potential. Instead, education is happening piece-meal, here and there, and no one has said the important thing aloud for fear of what others might say. Either we advance forward with AI, or we fall behind. AI is our partner, a tool, and either we learn to use it to better ourselves and our creations, or we will be passed by as a nation as other nations adopt a stronger work ethic.
Have your views on national unity and/or political opponents changed after the attempted assassination incident?
Sadly, I see Trump using that scary moment for his personal benefit. Instead of going on stage and telling people that this isn't the America we want, he's telling people that they need to "fight", just like he did after losing the election in 2020. We almost had another JFK moment. Just a few inches away and it would have happened. I am not sure that he will ever feel safe again. All of our leaders now have to worry. We've passed laws that let almost anyone have a rifle that can take a life. The cat is out of the bag, as they say. We can't make America safe again, sadly. Now I worry that every President will have to seriously worry that it might happen to them. They'll hunker down in safe areas instead of being among the people. It will become a job that no one wants. I don't want Democrats saying "see what hate breeds" and I don't want Republicans telling everyone to arm themselves. I want peace and people not to ever resort to violence when they're angry. Ever! I keep thinking that there will come a time when hateful people are silent for fear of us, the majority who want peace, but life isn't that way. We evolve, we change, we grow. And I see so many people growing in fear and arming themselves and building bunkers and talking big about what they'd do if so and so won. It is sad. But I still have hope that from the ashes will arise someone who is different, someone who is being raised by the many of us who want a Unity that allows for Diversity. That is my hope.
Environmental Policy and the Struggles of Political Cooperation
52 Black Woman, Democrat
To start, can you share your thoughts on the current level of political polarization in the United States and how it affects you personally?
I am very disgusted with the current level of political polarization in the United States. It affects me as an American citizen because one political party is not willing to work with the other to ensure that policies that are best for Americans are pushed forth.
Continue Reading
You mentioned that one political party is not willing to work with the other which is a point of frustration for you. Could you share an example or particular event that made you feel this way?
I know the Republican Party has frequently opposed the Democrats trying to push forth legislation related to climate change.
I appreciate your example. How has this particular disagreement between parties regarding climate change legislation affected your life or the community around you?
Climate change has impacted me in terms of energy costs. Due to much higher temperatures, I am running my air conditioning more frequently and much longer, and that higher use directly impacts my finances.
In your view, what does 'national unification' mean, and why is it important or not important to you?
National unification means both parties putting aside their party differences to come together and committing to work together for the good of this country.
I understand your point of view. Can you please tell me about a time when you felt the lack of unity significantly impacted the country or your community?
People are angrier, more radical, and more likely to be violent due to the rhetoric of one particular party.
That sounds like a challenging situation indeed. Can you elaborate and provide specific instances where you observed increased anger or radicalization? Or an incident where political differences escalated to violence in your immediate community or elsewhere?
I don't have any examples in my immediate community, but the January 6th incident is a perfect example of what can happen again due to a lack of unification.
The January 6th incident was indeed a defining moment in recent times. How did that event influence your perception of unity and political polarization in the United States?
It made me realize that there are some people who have an almost cultish allegiance to MAGA and Trump and that they are dangerous and that they are unwilling to work with Democrats.
That event indeed shocked the nation. Given that incident and other instances of polarization, do you have any thoughts or recommendations on steps that could foster unity or ways that policy compromises could be facilitated?
I really don't know because MAGA Republicans are unhinged and unwilling to work with Democrats.
That seems like a challenging situation. What are your thoughts on how Democrats or the political system as a whole could possibly handle such a scenario? Are there any measures that you think they can adopt to influence a more unified approach?
Putting party politics and egos to the side and committing to work for the good of the American people.
Would you be willing to compromise on some of your policy beliefs and preferences to support a movement toward greater unity?
Yes, I would be willing to compromise in order to help with the movement toward unification.
In which policy areas would you be willing to compromise and why? What would these compromises look like in your view?
I would be willing to compromise on gun control, allowing for gun ownership with some caveats like a ban on all assault weapons but being less restrictive with other firearms.
That's insightful. How do you believe that these compromises, such as adjustments on gun control policies, can be facilitated and accepted by both parties? Are there any mechanisms or approaches you can suggest?
I think just being open and truly listening to the other perspective.
Have your views on national unity and/or political opponents changed after the attempted assassination incident?
No, my views haven't changed. I think all high-powered AK-47 type weapons should be banned for purchase by US citizens and should only be used in the rare instances of war by the military.
Thank you for sharing your views on gun control. Applying what you said to the larger scale, how do you think we can encourage more people to adopt a mindset of compromise and open listening in order to work towards national unity?
By highlighting the place we are in now and that compromise is the only way to go in order to unify the country.
I see. Do you think there are any public figures or organizations who mainly influence people's subjectivity regarding "compromise" and "unification"? If so, who are they for you?
Former President Barack Obama stands out to me as a figure of compromise and unification.
Concerns Over Democracy:
The Effects of Political Violence and the Need for Unity
31 Asian Man, Democrat, Somewhat Liberal
To start, can you share your thoughts on the current level of political polarization in the United States and how it affects you personally?
The last year has been filled with political turmoil in the States, exasperated by the harrowing events in the past week.
Continue Reading
I understand that you feel the country has been through a lot, especially recently. Could you please elaborate on how these events have impacted you personally? I'm interested in understanding what specific experiences or incidents have led to any concerns or had a significant effect on you.
Violent acts between political parties tend to spell the beginning of the end for democracy. This has put much worry in my thoughts about the future of American democracy.
I see, the violence has caused you to worry about the future of American democracy. Can you please share any specific incidents of violence that have particularly affected you or led you to this viewpoint? How have these incidents influenced your conversations with your friends, family, or colleagues about political polarization?
The Capitol Riot in 2021 was particularly uncomfortable, followed by the assassination attempt in 2024.
In your view, what does 'national unification' mean, and why is it important or not important to you?
It should be important to a degree, because we all live in one nation after all.
I appreciate your perspective on the importance of national unification. You mentioned that we all live in one nation and hence it should matter, could you please expand a bit more on that? What specific aspects or features do you believe are essential for national unification?
I believe a united front in patriotism is essential, as well as the strive for economical dominance and military force.
Thank you for sharing that. It seems like patriotism, economic dominance, and military force are elements you associate with national unification. Can you discuss more on how you see these elements contributing towards unification in the country? Would you mind sharing some specific examples or experiences that led you to these beliefs?
I believe that massive acts of collaboration for charity could contribute to unification. I also believe that the shared love for media and culture can lead to unification.
That's interesting! You've mentioned collaboration for charity and shared love for media and culture as potential unifying factors. Could you please elaborate more on these points? Have you seen specific examples where these factors have created a sense of unity either in your community or on a larger scale? How do you think we can further promote these aspects to achieve more unity in the country?
The "Not Like Us" MV from Kendrick Lamar brought most of the country together.
Would you be willing to compromise on some of your policy beliefs and preferences to support a movement toward greater unity?
Maybe a few beliefs depending on what they were.
I appreciate your openness to policy compromises depending on the context. Can you share which policy areas you might be most willing to compromise on, or which areas you feel are most critical for creating more unity? In your view, what role should politicians, citizens, and organizations play in facilitating these compromises? Is there a historical instance of successful compromise that you believe serves as a good model for today's challenges?
I would be willing to compromise on some economic beliefs for the greater good. Citizens and politicians should compromise to put the USA in the best economical position among all countries.
That's insightful. When you mention "compromising on some economic beliefs for the greater good," can you help me understand what specific economic policies or areas come to mind? Could you also share some examples or scenarios where you observed citizens and politicians successfully compromise to improve the US's economic position? How do such compromises, in your view, contribute to enhancing national unity?
The compromises to cool inflation in 2024 has been a positive goal so far.
Have your views on national unity and/or political opponents changed after the attempted assassination incident?
It is a rocky era in American politics. The attempted assassination certainly widens the wedge between national unity. I am hoping for minimal retaliation from both sides.
Thank you for sharing your perspective. It sounds like the assassination attempt has had a significant impact on your views about national unification, leading to an increased concern about escalating conflicts between political factions. Could you please share more on how you feel these events have changed your perspective towards political opponents? Are there specific actions or measures you believe would be helpful in reducing conflict and fostering cooperation across party lines? How do you think this aspirational minimization of retaliation could be achieved in reality?
I maintain my personal resolve about political candidates; all candidates are still human beings and deserve respect.
Urban Development and Bipartisan Infrastructure: A Path to Reducing Political Conflict
35 White Man, Democrat, Very Liberal
To start, can you share your thoughts on the current level of political polarization in the United States and how it affects you personally?
I believe there's currently a lot of political polarization right now between Democrats and Republicans, since both parties have drastically different views and don't compromise on laws.
Continue Reading
You've shared that political polarization, particularly between Democrats and Republicans, has created a climate where there's a lack of compromise on laws. Can you share any personal experiences or observations which have led you to have this view? What are the direct or indirect effects you have experienced as a result of this political polarization?
Both parties have different views on urbanism. The Democrats want walkable, mixed-use communities that are vibrant, but the Republicans are NIMBYs and they don't want that. Both parties don't come to a compromise, and this leads to higher housing costs for everyone.
It's clear that the differing views on urbanism between Democrats and Republicans have significantly impacted you, particularly in the context of housing costs. Could you tell me more about how this has affected you or your community specifically? Also, were there any particular events or policy decisions that made you feel most strongly about this issue?
It affected my community as the Republican NIMBYs block affordable housing and parking minimums keep us car dependent.
In your view, what does 'national unification' mean, and why is it important or not important to you?
I believe national unification means both Democrats and Republicans are willing to work together on major issues, and it is important to prevent partisan conflict.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts. When you say national unification is important to prevent partisan conflict, could you elaborate more on what the possible positive outcomes might be, in your view, if more effort were made towards achieving national unification? Could you also please describe any specific examples or experiences that have led you to these beliefs?
Positive outcomes include creating laws and policies that benefit everyone, including both parties, and not being too polarized. There are already some bipartisan laws in Congress.
It's certainly true that bipartisan cooperation can lead to laws and policies that benefit a wider range of people. Can you describe any particular bipartisan laws or initiatives that you've found to be effective? How do you think these examples could help foster national unification?
A bipartisan infrastructure law that doesn't spend too much money but also is used to improve infrastructure. They don't cause partisan conflict.
I understand. You've shared the example of a bipartisan infrastructure law as a positive outcome of cooperation between parties. This is an important perspective. In your opinion, what key elements are necessary to achieve National Unification? What do you think are the major challenges or barriers in realizing it?
I think the barriers include each political party wanting to get their way and not willing to work with each other.
You've highlighted that a major barrier to National Unification is each political party wanting to get their way without compromise. From your perspective, how could National Unification be achieved despite these challenges? What specific actions or changes do you think might help bring about compromise and camaraderie between parties?
I think that there needs to be more political willpower to pass laws and make things more bipartisan.
Thank you for your insight. When you speak about "more political willpower," could you please elaborate? What kind of actions or behaviors would you like to see from political figures to demonstrate this willpower? Primarily, how do you think this could contribute to achieving an environment of bipartisanship and eventual National Unification?
More political willpower means politicians that have the will to work with both parties and not just favor themselves.
Would you be willing to compromise on some of your policy beliefs and preferences to support a movement toward greater unity?
I am willing to compromise on a few things as a Democrat: some slight restrictions on abortion and a few bipartisan reduced taxes.
You've mentioned that as a Democrat, you'd be willing to compromise on slight restrictions on abortion and some bipartisan reduced taxes. As these are critically important issues, how did you come to the conclusion that these are areas you would compromise on? Could you share any experience that led you to this view? And in terms of facilitating such compromises, what roles do you believe various stakeholders like politicians, citizens, and organizations should play?
I believe that abortion shouldn't be unrestricted completely but just some later bans like 20-week bans and requiring a waiting period to deter them.
Your willingness to compromise on an issue like abortion which is deeply personal and divisive indicates your commitment towards more unity. I'm interested in understanding how this perspective formed. Can you share what experiences or factors influenced you to consider a 20-week ban and the imposition of a waiting period reasonable compromises? Also, in such sensitive cases, what roles do you envision for politicians, citizens, and organizations in facilitating these changes?
I believe that late-term abortions are cruel as the mother already has time to think about it and they should have time to not make a rushed decision.
Have your views on national unity and/or political opponents changed after the attempted assassination incident?
I believe that there should be more unity now since this is political tension between parties, after Trump was almost assassinated.
Thank you for sharing your perspective. Can you discuss in more detail how the near-assassination of Trump influenced your thoughts on the need for more unity? Were there any specific reactions or responses to this event that particularly shaped your views? Additionally, what kind of measures do you think should be implemented to prevent such extreme political tensions in the future?
I believe that the political tensions were too much and it led to an extreme reaction, and I think there should be more security and bipartisan stuff.
The Dangers of Cancel Culture and the Loss of Civil Discourse
55 White Woman, Republican
To start, can you share your thoughts on the current level of political polarization in the United States and how it affects you personally?
As a 58 year old who has always been interested in politics, the last 15 years has proven to be some of the worst political polarization I have ever seen. People can not handle anyone having a differing political opinion without taking it as a personal affront. Differing opinions at a minimum have you classified as a racist, nazi, homophobe, xenophobe, communist, or sexist. Worst case has you cancelled or fired. It affects me personally, because you can't get away from it in your day to day life. It's all over social media, the news, and even within your own family. The vitriol spreads and I find myself feeling angry over the state of the country more often than not.
Continue Reading
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this matter. I'd like to know more about the situations you've encountered personally. Can you tell me about a specific incident where you felt the impact of political polarization in your day-to-day life?
A specific incident would be a holiday dinner with my husband's family. Our families have always had differing political views which has never caused a problem until the last 10 years. Now every holiday involves walking on egg shells, and having multiple topics off limits so as not to offend anyone. Before every holiday my husband and I get in a little argument over me lecturing him not to bring up any political issues. It causes stress and tension during the event and accomplishes absolutely nothing.
That sounds quite stressful. Bearing such personal experiences in mind, how do you think this political polarization can affect trust and understanding within a community or society as a whole? Also, have these experiences caused any change in your own perspective towards politics or political discussions over the years?
I think it can cause mistrust within a community and society as well. People are so obsessed with converting people to think the way they do politically, they are willing to lie and mislead to accomplish it. This breeds mistrust in the media, government, and community. It's even hard to believe evidence because it's becoming easier and easier to manufacture it. It has changed my perspective as well over the years. I mostly keep my opinions to myself when in social settings.
In your view, what does 'national unification' mean, and why is it important or not important to you?
National unification would mean people putting aside their political differences and working towards some common goals. We have completely lost this over the years. Politicians don't collaborate on anything anymore, and everything is split down party lines. There are fewer and fewer moderates, most people and politicians have moved towards the ends of the spectrum. It's important we move back toward the center and start working towards some common goals or we will go nowhere as a country.
You mentioned the importance of moving back towards the center and working towards common goals for national unification. Can you share any specific common goals you think could help bridge the current political divide?
Find some common ground on condemning any violence against political opponents. Moving away from this cancel culture would be a great start. This means on both sides.
Cancel culture and associated repercussions on both sides of the political spectrum is certainly a pressing concern. Could you share any personal experiences or incidents from your community that underscore the issue of cancel culture and its impact on national unification?
When people are afraid to speak out or give an opinion it's difficult to make progress as a community or a country as a whole. You can't unify if you don't even know where anyone stands. We had a family business run out of our town due to the owner stating a political opinion on a neighborhood group chat. This hurts our town, as we lost a business and a source of tax revenue.
That's a very poignant example. It's troubling that differences in political opinion can have such significant consequences. In terms of leading towards national unification, what roles do you think leadership both at the community and national levels should play? What qualities or actions do you think leaders should exhibit to encourage unity?
Lead by example. You can't expect Americans to unify if our own government officials can't act in a civilized manner. Our constituents need to reach across the aisle, stop demonizing the other party, and actually do the job they were elected to do. The art of compromise is lost in our government. They spend more time having investigations and trials trying to take out their opponents rather than working with them to unify America. We need people to be willing to step into the middle, and take the lead.
Would you be willing to compromise on some of your policy beliefs and preferences to support a movement toward greater unity?
Yes, as long as it was a true compromise.
You mentioned the importance of true compromise. Can you provide an example of what you would consider a "true compromise" related to a specific policy issue? What would the process look like, and what kind of outcome might it yield?
For example, the country is divided on abortion. Instead of abortions any time any reason, or 6 weeks bans, enact some legislation somewhere in the middle. Or the border. Instead of any open border policy, maybe make it easier to come into the country legally and close the border to illegal immigration.
Thank you for your examples. Speaking of facilitating such compromises, how do you think individuals, communities, or even politicians can contribute or play a role in the process? Also, do you believe there are any barriers or challenges in making these compromises effectively?
Individuals need to be more accepting of other people's opinions without launching a campaign to have someone fired or organizing a major protest. Politicians need to work on some bipartisan legislation. Almost never see that anymore. There are going to be barriers and challenges to making these compromises. If the politicians aren't willing to do it then the American people need to vote them out for more moderates.
Have your views on national unity and/or political opponents changed after the attempted assassination incident?
Yes, it has really gotten to a boiling point. We have people actively advocating for an assassin to kill a man. People died on that day. I don't know where people's humanity has gone.
It's concerning to hear about how the incident has brought to light an extreme form of political polarization. After such incidents, do you feel there is any way to restore or establish trust again among citizens with different political views? Also, how do such incidents shape your thought process when it comes to compromise and unity on policies?
I think the only way to establish trust again is through action not words. Citizens need to start seeing our politicians working together once again. The political rhetoric needs to stop. Maybe if we can listen without criticizing someone's opinion they will do the same and pay it forward. This incident has shaped my thoughts about compromise and unity. We are at the point where there is something more important than winning your political points.
Balancing Compromise and Core Beliefs in the Quest for National Unification
36 Black Woman, Democrat
To start, can you share your thoughts on the current level of political polarization in the United States and how it affects you personally?
The political polarization in the U.S. is really concerning. It feels like people are more divided than ever, and it affects everyday interactions, making conversations tense. As a black woman sometimes having to navigate through this divide can be quite exhausting.
Continue Reading
You've mentioned that the political polarization is making conversations tense and as a black woman, navigating through this divide can be exhausting. Could you please share a specific instance where you experienced such tenseness or exhaustion due to political polarization?
During a family gathering last Thanksgiving, a heated debate about police reform erupted. I felt the weight of the discussion deeply, especially when some relatives dismissed my concerns. The conversation quickly turned tense, and I felt exhausted trying to explain my perspective.
I understand how such conversations can be tiresome. It's quite unfortunate how these issues make their way into our personal gatherings and affect the atmosphere. Can you describe how this experience, and possibly others like it, have influenced your perception of the current political climate and its impacts on not only personal relationships but also the broader community or society?
These experiences have made me more aware of the deep divisions in our society. They strain personal relationships and create constant tension. It's disheartening to see how polarization affects not just individuals, but our ability to come together as a community to address important issues.
In your view, what does 'national unification' mean, and why is it important or not important to you?
I think national unification means bringing people together despite their differences to work towards common goals, and it's important to me because it fosters harmony and collective progress and makes society a better place overall.
You've described national unification as bringing people together to work towards common goals. Could you elaborate on what you might envision these common goals to be?
Common goals might include addressing racial inequality and ensuring access to quality education and healthcare for all. It's about creating a society where everyone has equal opportunities.
It's great to hear your perspective on these common goals. The goals you've mentioned -- addressing racial inequality, access to quality education, and healthcare for all -- denote a sense of social equality. Can you share a personal story or something you've observed in your community that underscores the importance of working towards such goals for achieving national unification?
In my community, I've seen how a lack of access to quality education has held back many talented individuals. One friend struggled to get into college due to underfunded schools.
That sounds like a tough situation for your friend. It's clear that such experiences underline the importance of the goals you mentioned earlier. In your opinion, what could be done to ensure better access to quality education, and thus, contribute to national unification?
Improving access to quality education involves directing resources to schools in need, offering scholarships for those who lack financial means, and setting up mentorship initiatives.
Thank you for these thoughtful suggestions. Education does seem to be a key factor in creating unity. How do you envision leaders playing a role in improving education and fostering national unification? What qualities or actions in leaders do you think could contribute to these goals?
Leaders play a crucial role in shaping education and fostering national unity through fair school funding, inclusive curricula, and supportive policies for educators and students. It's vital for them to show empathy, transparency, and a dedication to amplifying diverse voices.
Empathy, transparency, and dedication to diverse voices are certainly notable qualities. It's clear they can have an impact on leadership efforts towards education and national unification. How do you feel about the current leadership's role in fostering these areas? Are there specific actions or qualities you've noticed that are either helping or hindering this process?
I'm concerned about the current leadership's commitment to these ideals. There seems to be a lack of genuine empathy and inclusivity in their policies, which can hinder progress towards equitable education and national unity. More proactive efforts are needed to address systemic inequalities and uplift marginalized communities effectively.
You've highlighted genuine empathy and inclusivity as important leadership traits for progress and mentioned your concerns about their absence. Can you share more about the kinds of proactive efforts you'd like to see to address systemic inequalities? How do you think these reforms would contribute to national unification?
It's important to advocate for reforms addressing systemic inequalities in education, healthcare, and criminal justice. This includes ensuring equitable access to resources, fostering open dialogues on race and social justice, and implementing policies that empower marginalized communities.
Would you be willing to compromise on some of your policy beliefs and preferences to support a movement toward greater unity?
Yes, definitely.
You've expressed a willingness to compromise on some of your policy beliefs and preferences for greater unity. Could you give an example of a policy belief or preference that you'd be willing to compromise on, and explain why?
I'm willing to find middle ground on healthcare reform, even if it means adjusting the pace of implementing universal healthcare to accommodate different viewpoints.
It's quite interesting to hear that you'd be open to adjusting the pace of implementing universal healthcare for the sake of consensus. Can you share more about your thought process? How do you see such a policy compromise contributing to national unification?
I'm willing to consider a slower approach to implementing universal healthcare to build consensus and promote unity. This flexibility can lead to gradual improvements that benefit all, helping unite our nation more effectively.
Have your views on national unity and/or political opponents changed after the attempted assassination incident?
Not really.
Thank you for your response. Staying on the topic of the assassination attempt, can you elaborate why this incident didn't noticeably change your views on national unity or political opponents? Do you feel this could have been an opportunity for the nation to unite or was it simply a reflection of the ongoing political contentiousness?
I think it's more of a reflection of the political divide in the country.
Frustration with Political Gridlock: The Call for Bipartisan Cooperation
40 White Man, Republican
To start, can you share your thoughts on the current level of political polarization in the United States and how it affects you personally?
I think there is so much political polarization today that it is hard to believe at times honestly. This is especially evident with the recent events this last weekend. People on both sides could barely even wait a whole day before they were back arguing with each other again over even petty things. It is incredibly frustrating to me to see this.
Continue Reading
You mentioned that the level of recent political polarization is frustrating to you. Could you elaborate on how this level of political polarization directly or indirectly affects your daily life or your interactions with others? Are there specific examples or incidents that led to these feelings of frustration in you?
I hear that people want to work together, but then they show their true sides by just wanting to tear the other side down. I want to see the two political parties work together, but that doesn't seem possible with all the anger from each side. We can't get anything done for everyday citizens because they are too busy fighting, that really frustrates me.
In your view, what does 'national unification' mean, and why is it important or not important to you?
I think national unification is coming together for the good of the country as a whole. We don't have to be all members of one political party still, but we have to be willing to compromise and work together for the good of everyone. We need to stop showing racial bias as a part of this unification too.
Thank you for sharing your perspective on national unification. Let's delve a bit deeper. You mentioned the need to compromise and work together, as well as address racial bias. Would you be able to share some ways you believe these goals could be achieved? For instance, are there any specific policies, societal changes, or individual actions you think would help facilitate these necessary changes to promote unification?
I think we need to find some common ground on topics that affect everyone and find a way to pass bills to solve those problems. Each party will have to compromise some, but that is what is needed to achieve something together peacefully. Solving racial bias will be much harder, and that may take years to break bad habits that people have been taught or learned from their experiences. I'm not sure of a good solution for that, unfortunately.
Thank you for your insights. You've pointed out the possibility of finding common ground on topics that affect everyone to facilitate compromise and cooperation in policymaking as a path to national unification. In your opinion, what are these topics or issues that could serve as an area of compromise or commonality between different political factions? What fundamental changes do you believe need to occur in the current political system to promote such compromises?
I think protecting our country from terrorism and other domestic threats is something most all Americans can agree needs to be done. Also, stopping so many deaths from drugs seems to be another topic most can agree needs to be solved. I think it would go a long way if the media and people in general would stop spreading hateful speech about each other. That may make the leaders of the party realize they have more in common sometimes than they think because they constantly hear things that say otherwise right now.
Thank you for elaborating on these points. You highlighted that dealing with threats to national security and resolving the issue of drug-related deaths are common grounds where different political factions can come together. You also pointed out the role of media and public discourse in shaping political polarization. Let's spend some time exploring the role of leaders in this scenario. You indicated that leaders might realize they have more in common than they think if there was less hateful speech in the media and among people generally. In your worldview, what are the characteristics of a leader who can successfully bridge the divide in these polarized times? And what actions would you like to see from them in terms of mitigating the current levels of political polarization?
I think a leader that is willing to reach across the political aisle and work together is essential. He or she doesn't have to agree with everything, but they have to tone down the rhetoric about the opposite party and really hear out the other side. I would like to see them give speeches that just focus on the problems we have in our country, find resolutions, and don't blame either side for the problem.
Would you be willing to compromise on some of your policy beliefs and preferences to support a movement toward greater unity?
I would on some policy beliefs for unity, but not every single one of course.
While you've shown willingness to compromise on some policy beliefs for unity, could you elaborate on which particular policy areas you're open to compromising on and which ones are the most crucial to you? Also, what do you believe could be the impact, both positive and negative, of such policy compromises on national unity?
I would not compromise on abortion because I believe that is always wrong unless the mother's life is in danger. I think areas like healthcare and education are definite areas that compromise can be found. I think giving in on some areas would hopefully have the opposite party to be willing to do the same in return.
Thank you for your honesty. You've identified abortion as a non-negotiable point for you, and healthcare and education as potential areas of compromise. What kind of compromises would you be willing, or, envision making in these areas? And how do you believe these compromises could contribute to national unity? Furthermore, what challenges or barriers do you foresee in reaching these compromises?
I think how much we fund education and healthcare is hotly contested. I think spending more is possible if we could find other areas to save in the budget to fund those departments. I think this willingness to give some money to these budgets would help show unity. I think some people may not be willing to compromise on anything regardless of how much compromise you show.
Have your views on national unity and/or political opponents changed after the attempted assassination incident?
I think we do need to show much more unity as a country so nothing like this ever happens again to someone in any party. I hope that people will realize that violence like this is never the right option.
You mentioned a wish for people to realize that violence is never the right option and we need to show more unity as a country, especially in light of extreme events like the assassination attempt. Can you provide specific instances where you've seen positive examples of unity that can be built upon in the future, or any incidents or shifts that have indicated to you that unity might be an achievable goal?
I have seen people turn to prayer and God in their lives after this attempt, and I think that is a very good thing for our country. I hope this gives many people common ground where they can come together in unity.
Striving for Unity: Addressing Extremism and Protecting Marginalized Communities
23 Asian Woman, Democrat
To start, can you share your thoughts on the current level of political polarization in the United States and how it affects you personally?
It is highly polarized and scary. As a marginalized person, and a first generation American, it causes a great deal of unease as I see the right wing as hating people like me.
Continue Reading
I hear that you feel a sense of unease due to the current political climate. Can you share any specific instances or incidents that have contributed to this feeling? Also, how do you perceive political polarization impacting your community or society at large?
Racism towards me. Homophobia towards me. Misinformation spreading. Extreme policies.
In your view, what does 'national unification' mean, and why is it important or not important to you?
It is very important. At the end of the day, we are all responsible for each other. We have the power to help our fellow Americans and make all our lives better. To fight extremism and the erosion of our institutions, we need unity.
You've touched on fighting extremism and preserving our institutions as critical components of national unification. Can you explain more about what these concepts mean to you and how they contribute to a unified nation? Feel free to share any personal experiences or examples that might help explain your perspective.
I have always known it is a HUGE gift to be a US citizen because my parents are immigrants. I am a very proud American and this country means everything to me. I truly believe that we can make the promises of our Constitution and of "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" happen for every person. That means we have to fight extremism and focus on what improves lives. However, our existing institutions, while imperfect, are under attack - democracy is paramount and the Supreme Court MUST stay neutral.
I can hear your deep appreciation for your citizenship and your optimistic belief in the country's potential. From your perspective, how do you see the concept of 'compromise' playing a role in all of this? In other words, when thinking about necessary policy changes or societal shifts, how might the idea of political compromise facilitate national unification?
Compromise must be made in order to stop active emergencies. No matter what one's political views are, we need stability to make anything happen, and stability demands compromise. At the same time, we cannot compromise in the face of hate.
Would you be willing to compromise on some of your policy beliefs and preferences to support a movement toward greater unity?
I would not be willing to compromise on human rights. But I am happy to compromise and have to because no candidate fully aligns with me. I feel that making good political choices nowadays is all about harm reduction.
I appreciate your openness. Can you share a bit more about what policy areas you might be willing to compromise on and what areas you identify as non-negotiable? Are there certain conditions that would need to be met in order to facilitate such compromises? Again, feel free to use personal examples, if any come to mind.
Human rights are non-negotiable. The rights of disabled, LGBT, POC, and everyone marginalized. Climate change is non-negotiable. I can compromise by voting for politicians I'm not totally confident in because I know they have the best chance of making change and preventing bad things now.
Understood. Based on your personal experience and observation, how would you suggest politicians, citizens, and organizations facilitate these necessary policy compromises, especially when it comes to ensuring the rights of marginalized groups and tackling climate change?
Create open dialogue and break down barriers of misinformation by focusing on how literally everyone is suffering and needs relief.
Have your views on national unity and/or political opponents changed after the attempted assassination incident?
It hasn't changed because most people have reacted in a reasonable way. Those calling for violence and conspiracy theories were already doing it.
Could you talk more about the kinds of reactions you've seen people have to the incident? How have these reactions made you feel?
Most people wish it hadn't happened. I despise Trump and I believe he should be locked up forever and I'm sad it happened. Everyone I know agrees.
